Launch week offer: free shipping on Australian orders until 16 October
CRIUS ENDURANCE

11 September 2026

Energy Gels vs Endurance Gummies: Which Fuels You Better?

For most of the sport's modern history, the default endurance fuel has been a foil sachet of gel. It works - gels deliver fast, concentrated carbohydrate in a format light enough to carry dozens of for an ultra. But the format itself creates problems a lot of athletes just quietly put up with: the texture, the gut discomfort late in a long effort, the sticky foil you can't open with cold or tired hands. None of that is really about the carbohydrate - it's about the delivery format.

What actually causes mid-race gut distress

A lot of mid-race GI distress comes down to concentration and absorption, not just "too much sugar." Gels are designed to pack a lot of carbohydrate into a small volume, and when your gut is already under stress from hours of impact and reduced blood flow (it's working hard to keep your legs moving, not digest), a thick, concentrated syrup sitting in your stomach is exactly the wrong thing to ask it to process quickly. Chewing a fuel source instead of swallowing syrup changes that: it's taken in more gradually, mixed with saliva before it reaches your stomach, and doesn't sit as a slug of concentrated syrup the way a gel does.

Carbohydrate ratios matter more than the format

Sports science has settled on a 2:1 glucose-to-fructose ratio as generally optimal for carbohydrate absorption during exercise - glucose and fructose use different transporters in the gut, so combining them lets you absorb more carbohydrate per hour than glucose alone, without needing to eat more. This matters regardless of format: a gummy formulated with the wrong carb ratio doesn't fix anything, and a gel formulated with the right one still has the delivery problems above. The ratio and the format are two separate problems, and worth solving both.

Where chewable formats fall short of gels

To be fair to gels: they're still lighter and more compact per gram of carbohydrate than a chewable gummy, which matters over very long distances where you're carrying hours of fuel. Gummies also take a little longer to eat than squeezing a gel, which matters if you're fuelling at speed rather than at an aid station. Neither format is strictly better - they suit different efforts and different guts.

Which format actually suits you

If gels have never bothered you, there's no reason to drop them - plenty of athletes run both, gels for the fast, light moments and something chewable for the long, steady miles. And if you're one of the many runners who dreads the last few gels of a long race, or who's started avoiding fuelling because of how it feels, a chewable format built on the same 2:1 carb ratio - like Enduro Gummy - is worth trying in training well before you rely on it in a race. As with any fuelling change, test it on a long training run first, never for the first time on race day.

Try a no-melt, chewable format built on the 2:1 carb ratio.

Shop Enduro Gummy

← More Guides